<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PBB-TE (PBBTE) / PBT or will it be T-MPLS (MPLS-TP)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologyinside.com/2007/03/22/pbb-te-pbt-or-will-it-be-t-mpls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologyinside.com/2007/03/22/pbb-te-pbt-or-will-it-be-t-mpls/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The new network dogma: Has the wheel turned full circle? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://technologyinside.com/2007/03/22/pbb-te-pbt-or-will-it-be-t-mpls/#comment-7428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The new network dogma: Has the wheel turned full circle? &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologyinside.com/2007/03/22/pbb-te-pbt-or-will-it-be-t-mpls/#comment-7428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] too expensive, and too clunky for the metro environment.&#8221; Whether &#8216;thin MPLS&#8217; (PBB-TE / PBT or will it be T-MPLS?) will hold off the innovative PBB intruder remains to be seen. At the end of the day, the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] too expensive, and too clunky for the metro environment.&#8221; Whether &#8216;thin MPLS&#8217; (PBB-TE / PBT or will it be T-MPLS?) will hold off the innovative PBB intruder remains to be seen. At the end of the day, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enabling PBB-TE - MPLS seamless services &#171;</title>
		<link>http://technologyinside.com/2007/03/22/pbb-te-pbt-or-will-it-be-t-mpls/#comment-6448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Enabling PBB-TE - MPLS seamless services &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologyinside.com/2007/03/22/pbb-te-pbt-or-will-it-be-t-mpls/#comment-6448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This vision has driven a tremendous amount of standards activity that has resulted in the PBB-TE standard whereby inappropriate features have been stripped out of Ethernet to create a transport technology that can be used in carrier&#8217;s access networks. I&#8217;ve previously written about these initiatives in my posts - Ethernet goes carrier grade with PBT / PBB-TE? and PBB-TE / PBT or will it be T-MPLS?. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This vision has driven a tremendous amount of standards activity that has resulted in the PBB-TE standard whereby inappropriate features have been stripped out of Ethernet to create a transport technology that can be used in carrier&#8217;s access networks. I&#8217;ve previously written about these initiatives in my posts &#8211; Ethernet goes carrier grade with PBT / PBB-TE? and PBB-TE / PBT or will it be T-MPLS?. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

