<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GMPLS and common control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technologyinside.com/2007/04/16/gmpls-and-common-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technologyinside.com/2007/04/16/gmpls-and-common-control/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The new network dogma: Has the wheel turned full circle? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://technologyinside.com/2007/04/16/gmpls-and-common-control/#comment-7435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The new network dogma: Has the wheel turned full circle? &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologyinside.com/2007/04/16/gmpls-and-common-control/#comment-7435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] These gaps in capabilities in the new IP-for-everything vision needed to be corrected pretty quickly, so a plethora of standards development was initiated through the IETF that remains in full flow to this day. I can still remember my amazement in the mid 1990s when I came across a company had come up with the truly innovative idea to combine the deterministic ability of ATM with an IP router that brought together the best of the old with the new still under-powered IP protocol (The phenomenon of Ipsilon). This was followed by Cisco&#8217;s and the IETF&#8217;s development of MPLS and all its progeny protocols. (The rise and maturity of MPLS and GMPLS and common control). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These gaps in capabilities in the new IP-for-everything vision needed to be corrected pretty quickly, so a plethora of standards development was initiated through the IETF that remains in full flow to this day. I can still remember my amazement in the mid 1990s when I came across a company had come up with the truly innovative idea to combine the deterministic ability of ATM with an IP router that brought together the best of the old with the new still under-powered IP protocol (The phenomenon of Ipsilon). This was followed by Cisco&#8217;s and the IETF&#8217;s development of MPLS and all its progeny protocols. (The rise and maturity of MPLS and GMPLS and common control). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP Multimedia Subsystem or bust! &#171;</title>
		<link>http://technologyinside.com/2007/04/16/gmpls-and-common-control/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IP Multimedia Subsystem or bust! &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 12:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologyinside.com/2007/04/16/gmpls-and-common-control/#comment-849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] situation that provided the motivation to develop a common control plane for data services called GMPLS. Vertical service silos will be replaced with horizontal service, control and transport [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] situation that provided the motivation to develop a common control plane for data services called GMPLS. Vertical service silos will be replaced with horizontal service, control and transport [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Path Computation Element (PCE): IETF's hidden jewel &#171;</title>
		<link>http://technologyinside.com/2007/04/16/gmpls-and-common-control/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Path Computation Element (PCE): IETF's hidden jewel &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologyinside.com/2007/04/16/gmpls-and-common-control/#comment-429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Addendum #1: GMPLS and common control [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Addendum #1: GMPLS and common control [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPLS-TE and network traffic engineering &#171;</title>
		<link>http://technologyinside.com/2007/04/16/gmpls-and-common-control/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MPLS-TE and network traffic engineering &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technologyinside.com/2007/04/16/gmpls-and-common-control/#comment-428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Addendum #2: GMPLS and common control [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Addendum #2: GMPLS and common control [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

